condescension in action.

just wow. watch this if you haven’t seen it already. I have been hearing about it for a few days, but only just now watched it. this is much worse than when she told the General to call her “senator” instead of maam. I really hope the people in CA are watching this buffoon embarrass their state.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FE_jGD5nZ6U&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1]

Just remember always that this crowd is smarter than you and they care more than you do, so just sit back and let them make your world better.

sickening.

UPDATE: bonus from the House Republicans just because it is so delicious. These people are so smart, they think they can fool all of us yokels by saying now that they said something different then. too bad for them that video keeps longer than 6 or 7 months.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2MjQ17kDng&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1]

UPDATE II: and here are a couple of glimpses under the hood into the liberal mindset when they aren’t watching their mouth too closely:

the first is Tom Harkin in a nice summation showing all of us why government ownership of industry is a bad idea. It puts Congress in charge.

Washington, D.C. – Sen. Tom Harkin said he wants Congress to use a climate bill to force auto companies to make new cars and trucks capable of running on 85 percent ethanol as well as conventional gasoline.

We own the automobile companies. Why not? I think that will be an easy one,” Harkin said Thursday, referring to the government interests in Chrysler and General Motors.

emphasis added
the second is from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in a recent interview with the New York Times. (the link takes you to a Michael Gerson column pointing out that this rankly offensive drivel is not being taken out of context) talk about taking the mask off. eugenic ambition on display right here

The New York Times Magazine printed a candid interview with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, including this portion:

Q: “Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid abortions for poor women?”

Justice Ginsburg: “Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion.”

emphasis added

Hat tip to Frank for the Gerson column link. Gerson is mad and who could blame him.

This entry was posted in politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *